On Thursday I visited Gardner Campbell’s class. For me it was a chance to try to convey, to students who are mainly not on the engineering track, some key intuitions that arise from the architecture of the web. At one point I invited them to summon a grain of sand into existence, name it uniquely, cast it onto the web, and wait for search engines to notice.
At least one student, lisskane, tried the experiment. She wrote:
I’m going to completely admit that before this class I knew absolutely nothing about the WWW and Internet infrastructure. And honestly, it still confuses me. Who knew that the web and the Internet were different things? I thought they were simply interchangeable words, synonyms that could be looked up on Microsoft word. But they are different and when to my surprise when I click on Internet, there are no synonyms for it. It is it’s own thing. Which brings us to what Jon Udell was saying in class. When it comes to the World Wide Web, our imagination is our only limit. We decide what we want to make. Who we want to share it with and what we want it to mean. Take words for example. Dackolupatoni: when you Google that, nothing comes up. But here is our experiment. Let’s search it in a few hours and probably this will come up. Which is recursion. And then that person can be linked to this. And it goes on and on. Now isn’t that cool?
It sure is! Unfortunately for lisskane her grain of sand, dackolupatoni, has not yet fully awakened. Bing finds a tweet I posted yesterday. But neither Bing nor Google, as of Saturday morning, has yet made lisskane’s experiment in discovery and recursion come alive. This pains me. I want her to see it happen. But I realize I forgot to mention something. This power to cast grains of sand into the virtual world and than awaken them is a power that grows as you exercise it. Mine, after many years, is strong. Hers is nascent. But thanks to another wonderful property of the web I can share some of my power with her. So, Google and Bing, please awaken lisskane’s grain of sand.
13 thoughts on “Dackolupatoni”
Saturday morning 10:55 GMT-3 (Brazil). 8 search results on Google for Dackolupatoni. None for the original post yet… but it’s getting there! :-)
Indeed, Google and Bing have picked this up within two hours, but still not the original post. And Google doesn’t yet even link directly to this page, just your top-level blog and a bunch of re-posting “services”. The slimy oil residue on the beach.
slimy oil residue on the beach</i
Indeed. The oil slick has spread today. This raises an important point w/respect to the original purpose of the idea, which was to enable documents posted about a topic, to any website, to federate by agreement on use of a unique term. If you use no filter when looking at the beach you'll see plenty of slime. It's easy enough for us humans to pick out the objects of interest, still pretty hard for humans. Once we identify the sources of objects of interest, though, we can ascertain their sources and then construct whitelist filters — lenses that we can wear to tune out the slime and focus on the objects of interest.
Up to nine hits in Google now, including Jon’s Dakolupatoni podcast, in which Jon seems to channel Phillip Glass: Einstein on the Beach without the music!
[play selection “Knee 1”]
I dunno what that castroller thing is!
The untrusted SSL certificate on the original post is likely hurting (if not totally destroying) its search engine relevance.
Indeed. I suspected that, the outcome appears to confirm it. I would recommend the class not repeat the experiment until that is fixed.
Actually I just realized that although an https URL is what was given to me, for reasons I don’t understand, I could (and should) have just used the http counterpart which works just fine. I’ve made that change here belatedly.