To: elmcity, From: @curator, Message: start

Because I am lazy, curious, and evangelical, the elmcity service works in an unusual way. Anything that I can delegate to other services I do. So when curators add feeds to hubs, or modify the behavior of hubs, they do it by bookmarking and tagging URLs at It would be foolish to only keep that registry and configuration data in delicious, so I don’t, I persist it to Azure tables. But for now, I’m delegating the data entry interface to delicious.

It’s a lazy approach, in the good sense of lazy. I don’t want to build my own data entry system unless I can add important value, and in this case I can’t.

I’m also curious to see how far this approach can take us. As the project has evolved, so has the tag vocabulary spoken between curators and the service. It’s an easy and natural process, and I don’t see any roadblocks ahead.

Finally, I’m evangelizing this way of doing things because I continue to think that more people should appreciate it.

In this scenario I’ve delegated something else to delicious: authentication. My service doesn’t have its own user accounts. Instead, as the administrator of the service, I tell it to trust a specific set of delicious accounts. When one of those accounts bookmarks an iCalendar URL, and tags it in a particular way, the service regards that as an authenticated request to add the feed to that hub’s registry.

Other requests that curators can make include:

Make the radius for my hub 5 miles.

Make my timezone Arizona.

Get my CSS file from this URL.

But here’s one that curators have wanted to make and couldn’t:

I just added a feed or changed a configuration option. Please reprocess my hub ASAP.

We could represent this message with a tag. Or we could use the rudimentary messaging system in delicious. But these approaches seemed awkward, and I rejected them.

Well, why not Twitter? True, it means that curators who want to send messages to the service will now need accounts in two places. But if they don’t already have accounts on both delicious and Twitter, they can create them. And those accounts will serve them in a variety of ways, unlike a single-purpose account on elmcity.

So, it’s done. As the curator for Keene, I’ve added the tag twitter=judell to the delicious account that controls the Keene hub. As the elmcity service periodically scans its designated set of delicious accounts, it follows any Twitter handle it isn’t already following. Those Twitter accounts can then send direct messages to the Twitter account of the elmcity service.

For now there’s only one thing a curator can say to the service in a direct message — “start” — which means “please reprocess my hub ASAP.” But I’m sure the control vocabulary will evolve. And of course the service can use the channel to send notifications back to curators.

Twitter is famously unreliable, but that should be OK for my purposes. We’re not controlling the space shuttle. If a message doesn’t get through to the service on the first or second try, it’ll get through eventually, and that’ll be good enough.

Someday I may have to build a data entry system and an accounts system. Then again, maybe not. Meanwhile I’m going to keep exploring this lightweight approach. It’s effective and, not coincidentally, it’s fun.

Posted in .

9 thoughts on “To: elmcity, From: @curator, Message: start

  1. > Can we add more than one twitter account
    > say 2? Like so:

    > twitter=user1 twitter=user2″

    Not currently, because it’s implemented as a dictionary, so the key, twitter, would wind up pointing to the second value, user2.

    But, say why this would be useful to you.

  2. Not to make Bill’s argument for him, but one obvious use case would be to allow multiple curators to use their own twitter accounts rather than creating a unique account soley for communicating with elmcity.

  3. Ребята , нужно Ваше мнение , кто знает или сталкивался.

    Хочу купить подвеску с бриллиантом массой от карата, но осознаю, что это стоит очень дорого и мне не по карману.

    Но слышала , что есть облагороженные бриллианты, которые ничем не отличаются от обычных, но стоят меньше в

    три раза.

    Кто-нибудь вообще держал такие в руках, они правда прекрасны ?

Leave a Reply