August 2010


Ever since I saw tomatoes growing in a greenhouse that had a suspension system to hoist them up, I’ve wanted to do something like that. I’ve also been wanting to make a structure using Starplate connectors. This year the two ideas came together to create a tomato suspension dome.

The structure

The kit

The Starplate kit is just 11 metal plates that accept 2-by-3s or 2-by-4s on edge, like so:

I used 8-foot 2-by-3s. Around the edge of the pentagonal base I planted peas, pole beans, and morning glories. Inside, it was all tomatoes and basil. Although I used indeterminate vines, they didn’t reach as high as I’d imagined. So I never had to climb a ladder to pick tomatoes.

The big question in my mind was how to hoist the tomatoes. I ended up putting eyehooks into the upper struts, spaced about 18″ apart, and running string through them to form concentric pentagons descending from the peak. Then I could toss the weighted end of a string up and over to make a pulley anywhere in the enclosure.

Suspension

Here’s the suspension method:

It entails:

  1. Wrapping a loop of tomato velcro around the vine
  2. Tying one end of string to the loop
  3. Running the other end up over a skyhook, down through the loop, and back up six inches or so
  4. Hoisting the vine
  5. Tying the end into a slipknot around the pair of strings

Every couple of weeks, as the vines grew, I’d detach the collar, raise it up, reattach, and hoist.

Outcomes

The peas and beans did OK, but were happier in other parts of the garden. The tomatoes rocked. I’m not ambitious enough to do any real canning, but here’s one happy outcome: 6 quarts of fresh salsa and a couple of gallons of juice infused with jalapenos, serranos, and poblanos.

Another outcome: oven-dried tomatoes. These are just like sun-dried except they only take 12 hours in the oven at 200 instead of days in the sun.

The salsa was a ton of work but oven drying is dead easy. I’ve got a lot more tomatoes still to come, and this the future for many of them.

Next year

Things to do differently:

  1. Start the morning glories sooner. When the peas and beans didn’t cooperate, I wanted another use for all the height I’d created, but the morning glories got a late start.
  2. Abandon netting. Part of the problem with the peas and beans was that I hung netting for them to climb. Bad idea. Next time, I’ll just dangle a bunch of strings.
  3. In late winter, dump in manure to generate heat and enclose with plastic to create a greenhouse.

Is this really practical?

Probably not. If you’ve ever been bitten by the dome bug, it’s just something you have to get out of your system sooner or later. Domes are preposterous structures, really, as Stewart Brand pointed out hilariously in How buildings learn. There’s a reason why we build rectangularly: You can use standard materials, you can expand outward, you can use interior space efficiently. Domes create big structures from small amounts of material, but they’re not very practical structures. There are surely easier ways to hoist tomatoes. Still, it’s been fun!

I had a hunch that if I grew sunflowers in a fenced enclosure inside the chicken run they’d get big, since that’s the most fertile part of my backyard. Tonight I measured the tallest at 10 feet, 8 inches (3.25 meters). It’s stout, too, I feel like I could almost climb it. Impressive!

Yeah, but how impressive? And, even more interesting to me, how can we find data to help answer the question? Perhaps with a sequence of searches like so:

“1-foot sunflower”

“2-foot sunflower”

…etc…

“26-foot sunflower”

“27-foot sunflower”

These are parallel searches of Google and Bing for [1..27]-foot sunflower”. Here are the resulting counts, with Bing scaled up by a factor of 100 to make the trends comparable:

So, maybe my near-11-footer isn’t so special after all. This method of finding out is interesting, though. It seems incredibly naive. If you try those queries you’ll find all sorts of stuff that isn’t relevant to what I mean by an n-foot sunflower. But if the amount of irrelevance is constant across the range, it factors out, right? And the two independent search engines make this a controlled experiment.

I wonder how well this proxy for sunflower height distribution correlates with the actual distribution. Of course there are a million other questions you could try to answer this way. It’d be easy to make a web app to automate this method. I lazily hope somebody already has, or will, so I don’t have to.


PS: My sunflowers are actually a second crop. The first one had a crazy head start, because we had freaky warm weather in February. But then in early April, when they were already 3 feet high, the chickens broke into the enclosure and demolished them. What lofty heights could my sunflowers have reached this summer? We’ll never know.


PPS: Here’s the data:

1,2,0
2,994,10
3,8,4
4,10,4
5,9,4
6,3270,37
7,74,11
8,135,12
9,176,11
10,1690,39
11,75,9
12,472,37
13,82,12
14,220,8
15,54,9
16,9,4
17,2,1
18,55,4
19,6,2
20,119,8
21,0,0
22,2,0
23,0,0
24,8,3
25,891,2
26,3,2
27,0,0

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 54 other followers