<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jock Gill on energy, information, technology, networks, markets, and society (part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/09/16/jock-gill-on-energy-information-technology-networks-markets-and-society-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/09/16/jock-gill-on-energy-information-technology-networks-markets-and-society-part-1/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim W</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/09/16/jock-gill-on-energy-information-technology-networks-markets-and-society-part-1/#comment-125553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=634#comment-125553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[England was fast using up its forests for creating these 

products, and potash became a valued export for the American 

colonists.

Pearlash (Pure Ash) was another matter, made by manufacturers 

using kilns that burned off all impurities, they were left with 

pure sodium hydroxide. There was a global demand for the New 

World product.

By the 1770&#039;s England was so deforested due to 

industrialization, they couldn&#039;t make soda for soap making 

without imports. Pearlash, or pure potash, was a product 

England needed so badly it restricted the colony&#039;s export of 

all New World Pearlash to English buyers.

Potash-making became a major industry in British North America. 

Great Britain was always the most important market. The 

American potash industry followed the woodsman&#039;s ax across the 

country. After about 1820, New York replaced New England as the 

most important source; by 1840 the center was in Ohio. Potash 

production was always a by-product industry, following from the 

need to clear land for agriculture.

By 1850, potash had gained popularity as a fertilizer, but 

forests available for indiscriminate burning were becoming ever 

scarcer]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>England was fast using up its forests for creating these </p>
<p>products, and potash became a valued export for the American </p>
<p>colonists.</p>
<p>Pearlash (Pure Ash) was another matter, made by manufacturers </p>
<p>using kilns that burned off all impurities, they were left with </p>
<p>pure sodium hydroxide. There was a global demand for the New </p>
<p>World product.</p>
<p>By the 1770&#8242;s England was so deforested due to </p>
<p>industrialization, they couldn&#8217;t make soda for soap making </p>
<p>without imports. Pearlash, or pure potash, was a product </p>
<p>England needed so badly it restricted the colony&#8217;s export of </p>
<p>all New World Pearlash to English buyers.</p>
<p>Potash-making became a major industry in British North America. </p>
<p>Great Britain was always the most important market. The </p>
<p>American potash industry followed the woodsman&#8217;s ax across the </p>
<p>country. After about 1820, New York replaced New England as the </p>
<p>most important source; by 1840 the center was in Ohio. Potash </p>
<p>production was always a by-product industry, following from the </p>
<p>need to clear land for agriculture.</p>
<p>By 1850, potash had gained popularity as a fertilizer, but </p>
<p>forests available for indiscriminate burning were becoming ever </p>
<p>scarcer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jock Gill on energy, information, technology, networks, markets, and society (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/09/16/jock-gill-on-energy-information-technology-networks-markets-and-society-part-1/#comment-125358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jock Gill on energy, information, technology, networks, markets, and society (part 1)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=634#comment-125358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Jock Gill on energy, information, technology, networks, markets, and society (part 1)  Here is the first part of a two-part interview with Jock Gill, whom I can only partly describe as a technologist, philosopher, humanist, media hacker, and alternative energy entrepeneur. We met in a wonderfully serendipitous way. I was on a bicycle tour through the White Mountain National Forest last month, staying overnight with a friend [&#8230;] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jock Gill on energy, information, technology, networks, markets, and society (part 1)  Here is the first part of a two-part interview with Jock Gill, whom I can only partly describe as a technologist, philosopher, humanist, media hacker, and alternative energy entrepeneur. We met in a wonderfully serendipitous way. I was on a bicycle tour through the White Mountain National Forest last month, staying overnight with a friend [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

