<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The continuum of access styles in the emerging Microsoft cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alternative logging for Azure services &#171; Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-126637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alternative logging for Azure services &#171; Jon Udell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-126637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Or actually, three of them. One is Amazon&#8217;s SimpleDB, the second is the SQL Server-based SQL Data Services, and the third is Azure&#8217;s table storage. I figure my service will generate a lot of real data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Or actually, three of them. One is Amazon&#8217;s SimpleDB, the second is the SQL Server-based SQL Data Services, and the third is Azure&#8217;s table storage. I figure my service will generate a lot of real data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronPython/Azure status report &#171; Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-126001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IronPython/Azure status report &#171; Jon Udell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-126001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] becomes possible, in this new world, for platforms to support a continuum of access styles. You want object-oriented? Do it that way. RESTful? Go for it. You know the Python or Ruby [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] becomes possible, in this new world, for platforms to support a continuum of access styles. You want object-oriented? Do it that way. RESTful? Go for it. You know the Python or Ruby [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: URI, XML, HTTP, REST, and the Azure Services Platform &#171; Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-125736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[URI, XML, HTTP, REST, and the Azure Services Platform &#171; Jon Udell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-125736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Microsoft platform not only spans a continuum of programmable devices and services, it also spans a continuum of access styles. I think this is a great story, and I&#8217;m exceedingly happy to finally be able to tell it. Go [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft platform not only spans a continuum of programmable devices and services, it also spans a continuum of access styles. I think this is a great story, and I&#8217;m exceedingly happy to finally be able to tell it. Go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSOAC#31 - AWS startup challenge! - Service Endpoint</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-125239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WSOAC#31 - AWS startup challenge! - Service Endpoint]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-125239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Jon Udell - The continuum of access styles in the emerging Microsoft cloud [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jon Udell &#8211; The continuum of access styles in the emerging Microsoft cloud [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Links for August 28th</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-125131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[People Over Process &#187; Links for August 28th]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-125131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The continuum of access styles in the emerging Microsoft cloud &#171; Jon Udell [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The continuum of access styles in the emerging Microsoft cloud &laquo; Jon Udell [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Jennings</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-125122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Jennings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-125122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Soumitra,

According to Charles Ying, SimpleDB runs Erlang (see http://www.satine.org/archives/2007/12/13/amazon-simpledb/).

@Jon,

For a different approach to a SSDS client that runs REST and SOAP (and compares performance), see http://oakleafblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/updated-sql-server-data-services-ssds.html.

--rj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Soumitra,</p>
<p>According to Charles Ying, SimpleDB runs Erlang (see <a href="http://www.satine.org/archives/2007/12/13/amazon-simpledb/" rel="nofollow">http://www.satine.org/archives/2007/12/13/amazon-simpledb/</a>).</p>
<p>@Jon,</p>
<p>For a different approach to a SSDS client that runs REST and SOAP (and compares performance), see <a href="http://oakleafblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/updated-sql-server-data-services-ssds.html" rel="nofollow">http://oakleafblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/updated-sql-server-data-services-ssds.html</a>.</p>
<p>&#8211;rj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soumitra Sengupta</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-125120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soumitra Sengupta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-125120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to John Spurlock for pointing out a key difference between SSDS and S3+SimpleDB combination. While I think &quot;eventual consistency&quot; will surprise a lot of developers as they build applications, I understand the trade-offs.  Question is whether most developers understand the differences and the trade-offs between &quot;consistent&quot; and &quot;eventually consistent&quot;.  I think there is place for both but until I hear from actual developers writing real applications, I remain interested to see how this issue evolves.

There is another subtle on as the services are exposed today.  SQL Server Data Services (SSDS) supports a few primitive types while string seems to be the only type supported by SimpleDB.  It has implications in how predicates are evaluated during filtering and semantics of sort.

BTW,does anyone know what Amazon is using as the underlying engine for SimpleDB?  First rumors were that it was Dynamo but I have also heard rumors that it is Berkeley DB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to John Spurlock for pointing out a key difference between SSDS and S3+SimpleDB combination. While I think &#8220;eventual consistency&#8221; will surprise a lot of developers as they build applications, I understand the trade-offs.  Question is whether most developers understand the differences and the trade-offs between &#8220;consistent&#8221; and &#8220;eventually consistent&#8221;.  I think there is place for both but until I hear from actual developers writing real applications, I remain interested to see how this issue evolves.</p>
<p>There is another subtle on as the services are exposed today.  SQL Server Data Services (SSDS) supports a few primitive types while string seems to be the only type supported by SimpleDB.  It has implications in how predicates are evaluated during filtering and semantics of sort.</p>
<p>BTW,does anyone know what Amazon is using as the underlying engine for SimpleDB?  First rumors were that it was Dynamo but I have also heard rumors that it is Berkeley DB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Spurlock</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-125119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Spurlock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-125119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right to compare SSDS to a /combination/ of SimpleDB and S3.

SSDS is also &quot;actually consistent&quot; instead of &quot;eventually consistent&quot; (like SimpleDB/S3) which makes it applicable to radically different use cases.  I&#039;d imagine this was an explicit decision, acknowledging the corresponding tradeoffs, and it will be interesting to see which approach gains more traction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right to compare SSDS to a /combination/ of SimpleDB and S3.</p>
<p>SSDS is also &#8220;actually consistent&#8221; instead of &#8220;eventually consistent&#8221; (like SimpleDB/S3) which makes it applicable to radically different use cases.  I&#8217;d imagine this was an explicit decision, acknowledging the corresponding tradeoffs, and it will be interesting to see which approach gains more traction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-125118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Udell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-125118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; The “continuum of access styles” also 
&gt; applies to ADO.NET Data Services (a.k.a. 
&gt; Astoria)

Correct. And other emerging pieces, notably Live Mesh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; The “continuum of access styles” also<br />
&gt; applies to ADO.NET Data Services (a.k.a.<br />
&gt; Astoria)</p>
<p>Correct. And other emerging pieces, notably Live Mesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Jennings</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/08/27/the-continuum-of-access-styles-in-the-emerging-microsoft-cloud/#comment-125111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Jennings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonudell.wordpress.com/?p=565#comment-125111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon,

The &quot;continuum of access styles&quot; also applies to ADO.NET Data Services (a.k.a. Astoria) which supports REST queries and JSON or AtomPub wire formats. SSDS&#039;s Web-facing head-end is scheduled to be updated to Astoria standards in a future update.

--rj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>The &#8220;continuum of access styles&#8221; also applies to ADO.NET Data Services (a.k.a. Astoria) which supports REST queries and JSON or AtomPub wire formats. SSDS&#8217;s Web-facing head-end is scheduled to be updated to Astoria standards in a future update.</p>
<p>&#8211;rj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

