<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WebSlices can help popularize feed syndication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: network security</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-198630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[network security]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 09:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-198630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;network security...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]WebSlices can help popularize feed syndication &#171; Jon Udell[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>network security&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]WebSlices can help popularize feed syndication &laquo; Jon Udell[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john ddenz</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-139432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john ddenz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-139432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally prefer &quot;PageSlices addon for Firefox&quot; for creating web slices from any portion of any web site. 
You can even store multiple web slices on user pages and create your personal gallery of slices.
Web site of the project: http://pageslices.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally prefer &#8220;PageSlices addon for Firefox&#8221; for creating web slices from any portion of any web site.<br />
You can even store multiple web slices on user pages and create your personal gallery of slices.<br />
Web site of the project: <a href="http://pageslices.net" rel="nofollow">http://pageslices.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oomph for Firefox: Microsoft’s Microformats IE plugin as Greasemonkey script - Money From Adsense</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-127647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oomph for Firefox: Microsoft’s Microformats IE plugin as Greasemonkey script - Money From Adsense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-127647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] several people have argued that the webslices that came with IE8, are in fact a somewhat different [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] several people have argued that the webslices that came with IE8, are in fact a somewhat different [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oomph for Firefox: Microsoft&#8217;s Microformats IE plugin as Greasemonkey script</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-125886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oomph for Firefox: Microsoft&#8217;s Microformats IE plugin as Greasemonkey script]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-125886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] several&#160; people have argued that the webslices that came with IE8, are in fact a somewhat different [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] several&#160; people have argued that the webslices that came with IE8, are in fact a somewhat different [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stopped Clock Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stopped Clock Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] working on OPML and RSS icons this eveni^W morning, so this one came out for free. Not that I think the symbol is meaningful. It&#8217;s really just a coincidence I&#8217;ve had this open in Inkscape and bumped [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] working on OPML and RSS icons this eveni^W morning, so this one came out for free. Not that I think the symbol is meaningful. It&#8217;s really just a coincidence I&#8217;ve had this open in Inkscape and bumped [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Reynen</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Reynen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;A civilian would, I think, relate to the idea that pieces of frequently-visited web pages — weather info, stock info — can start to surface in other, more convenient contexts.&quot;

The (only) explanation I&#039;ve heard for IE including WebSlices and not existing microformats is that microformats focus on commonly-published data (e.g. weather info, stock info), but only provide the ability to parse such data when it&#039;s microformatted. As a result, users will see this data all over the web, but only be able to parse it on specific sites, which will be confusing. I think that position makes some sense, though I think the data is worth that potential confusion. What I don&#039;t think makes sense is your expectation that this is going to change. If IE&#039;s parsing of weather data is subject to all or even a majority of weather data being formatted to a standard, that&#039;s effectively a declaration that such parsing will never happen. In a similar chicken-and-egg data web problem, IE 8 also (still) fails to parse XHTML with a proper MIME type, stifling the progress of XHTML-based-RDF work. From my perspective, there&#039;s a lot of harm being done by IE failing to support these emerging data-web standards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A civilian would, I think, relate to the idea that pieces of frequently-visited web pages — weather info, stock info — can start to surface in other, more convenient contexts.&#8221;</p>
<p>The (only) explanation I&#8217;ve heard for IE including WebSlices and not existing microformats is that microformats focus on commonly-published data (e.g. weather info, stock info), but only provide the ability to parse such data when it&#8217;s microformatted. As a result, users will see this data all over the web, but only be able to parse it on specific sites, which will be confusing. I think that position makes some sense, though I think the data is worth that potential confusion. What I don&#8217;t think makes sense is your expectation that this is going to change. If IE&#8217;s parsing of weather data is subject to all or even a majority of weather data being formatted to a standard, that&#8217;s effectively a declaration that such parsing will never happen. In a similar chicken-and-egg data web problem, IE 8 also (still) fails to parse XHTML with a proper MIME type, stifling the progress of XHTML-based-RDF work. From my perspective, there&#8217;s a lot of harm being done by IE failing to support these emerging data-web standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Udell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Instead, this seems more like an attempt at a preemptive first strike to establish proprietary functionality deliberately *incompatible* with the work that has been developed incrementally in full public view.&quot;

There&#039;s nothing proprietary about the functionality. I was about to ask: &quot;How long before Firefox extensions show up that do these things?&quot; And then I saw your later comment: it took a day.

For me this really is about the hope that by bringing two key concepts together -- microformats and syndication -- in a package that will reach a lot of people, those ideas will take root and flourish.

I&#039;ve spent a lot of time and energy trying to explain these concepts. First, that nuggets of structured data embedded in web pages can have special value, and are worth creating and exchanging. Second, that syndication  creates networks of awareness, and that there are all sorts of useful ways to produce and consume feeds. 

The principles at work, and the applications of them, are just too abstract to make sense to most people. I understand the Operator toolbar because I&#039;m immersed in the concepts, but a civilian wouldn&#039;t know what to do with it, or why. 

A civilian would, I think, relate to the idea that pieces of frequently-visited web pages -- weather info, stock info -- can start to surface in other, more convenient contexts. 

My hope, and it&#039;s only a hope, is that by nurturing that understanding, there will be a broader appeal for a whole class of tools and techniques related to microformats and syndication. If it works out that way, great. If not, no harm done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Instead, this seems more like an attempt at a preemptive first strike to establish proprietary functionality deliberately *incompatible* with the work that has been developed incrementally in full public view.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing proprietary about the functionality. I was about to ask: &#8220;How long before Firefox extensions show up that do these things?&#8221; And then I saw your later comment: it took a day.</p>
<p>For me this really is about the hope that by bringing two key concepts together &#8212; microformats and syndication &#8212; in a package that will reach a lot of people, those ideas will take root and flourish.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time and energy trying to explain these concepts. First, that nuggets of structured data embedded in web pages can have special value, and are worth creating and exchanging. Second, that syndication  creates networks of awareness, and that there are all sorts of useful ways to produce and consume feeds. </p>
<p>The principles at work, and the applications of them, are just too abstract to make sense to most people. I understand the Operator toolbar because I&#8217;m immersed in the concepts, but a civilian wouldn&#8217;t know what to do with it, or why. </p>
<p>A civilian would, I think, relate to the idea that pieces of frequently-visited web pages &#8212; weather info, stock info &#8212; can start to surface in other, more convenient contexts. </p>
<p>My hope, and it&#8217;s only a hope, is that by nurturing that understanding, there will be a broader appeal for a whole class of tools and techniques related to microformats and syndication. If it works out that way, great. If not, no harm done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael R. Bernstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon, I came across this guy implementing IE8&#039;s Activities for Firefox:
http://www.kaply.com/weblog/category/activities/

Pretty fast work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, I came across this guy implementing IE8&#8242;s Activities for Firefox:<br />
<a href="http://www.kaply.com/weblog/category/activities/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kaply.com/weblog/category/activities/</a></p>
<p>Pretty fast work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Around the web - March 8, 2008 : business&#124;bytes&#124;genes&#124;molecules</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Around the web - March 8, 2008 : business&#124;bytes&#124;genes&#124;molecules]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Jon Udell likes WebSlices [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jon Udell likes WebSlices [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a happy user of Operator and Semantic Radar, I like the direction that browsers are going, but what about the authoring tools.  I&#039;ve watched at least two corporate web design operations and in both cases, microformats and semantic markup were not in the discussion and the people responsible for authoring just are not aware.  Now if our authoring tools automatically did this or encouraged users to do so then we&#039;d be in good shape.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a happy user of Operator and Semantic Radar, I like the direction that browsers are going, but what about the authoring tools.  I&#8217;ve watched at least two corporate web design operations and in both cases, microformats and semantic markup were not in the discussion and the people responsible for authoring just are not aware.  Now if our authoring tools automatically did this or encouraged users to do so then we&#8217;d be in good shape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael R. Bernstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve also noticed, though, that many good ideas never emerge from that phase into the mainstream.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, sure. Companies should feel free to use whatever marketing tools (and market power, within reason) at their disposal to *move* ideas and implementations from that phase into the mainstream, but that&#039;s not exactly what&#039;s happening here.

Instead, this seems more like an attempt at a preemptive first strike to establish proprietary functionality deliberately *incompatible* with the work that has been developed incrementally in full public view.

To paraphrase a famous literary critique: The IE8 beta is both innovative and good. Unfortunately the parts that are good are not innovative, and the parts that are innovative are not good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ve also noticed, though, that many good ideas never emerge from that phase into the mainstream.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, sure. Companies should feel free to use whatever marketing tools (and market power, within reason) at their disposal to *move* ideas and implementations from that phase into the mainstream, but that&#8217;s not exactly what&#8217;s happening here.</p>
<p>Instead, this seems more like an attempt at a preemptive first strike to establish proprietary functionality deliberately *incompatible* with the work that has been developed incrementally in full public view.</p>
<p>To paraphrase a famous literary critique: The IE8 beta is both innovative and good. Unfortunately the parts that are good are not innovative, and the parts that are innovative are not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the slices support Javascripts? And are the stylesheets included when viewing the slices?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the slices support Javascripts? And are the stylesheets included when viewing the slices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Udell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This seems to me a better approach than springing new features&quot;

It&#039;s an incredibly useful approach. As you know I&#039;m a big fan of incrementalism and exploratory development. I&#039;ve also noticed, though, that many good ideas never emerge from that phase into the mainstream. As Perl folk say, there is more than one way to do it.

&quot;It seems to me that will give microformats a bigger boost.&quot;

Hope so. The idea needs all the wind behind its sails that it can get.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This seems to me a better approach than springing new features&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an incredibly useful approach. As you know I&#8217;m a big fan of incrementalism and exploratory development. I&#8217;ve also noticed, though, that many good ideas never emerge from that phase into the mainstream. As Perl folk say, there is more than one way to do it.</p>
<p>&#8220;It seems to me that will give microformats a bigger boost.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hope so. The idea needs all the wind behind its sails that it can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrmike</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the thing I found annoying is that when I added the slice, the favorites toolbar was displayed.  I&#039;d rather go the exlorer bar instead (ctrl+shift+j).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the thing I found annoying is that when I added the slice, the favorites toolbar was displayed.  I&#8217;d rather go the exlorer bar instead (ctrl+shift+j).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/03/05/webslices-can-help-popularize-feed-syndication/#comment-122754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael R. Bernstein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/?p=340#comment-122754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, OK, but historically Microsoft&#039;s penchant for releasing &quot;Nice idea! Hey, we&#039;ve come up with our own implementation that isn&#039;t compatible, thanks anyway.&quot; technologies hasn&#039;t usually done much except warn VCs off from an area of investment.

Also note that it&#039;s not that unusual for Firefox add-ons to serve as a testbed for experimenting with technologies and features before they are incorporated into the main browser once they proved their utility and popularity. This seems to me a better approach than springing new features and formats fully formed as from the forehead of Zeus.

Here is a list of other Firefox microformats extensions, since you weren&#039;t aware of Operator:

http://microformats.org/wiki/firefox-extensions

And note that Firefox 3 will have a microformat API and associated features, heavily inspired by Operator:

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_does_microformats_firefox3.php

It seems to me that will give microformats a bigger boost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, OK, but historically Microsoft&#8217;s penchant for releasing &#8220;Nice idea! Hey, we&#8217;ve come up with our own implementation that isn&#8217;t compatible, thanks anyway.&#8221; technologies hasn&#8217;t usually done much except warn VCs off from an area of investment.</p>
<p>Also note that it&#8217;s not that unusual for Firefox add-ons to serve as a testbed for experimenting with technologies and features before they are incorporated into the main browser once they proved their utility and popularity. This seems to me a better approach than springing new features and formats fully formed as from the forehead of Zeus.</p>
<p>Here is a list of other Firefox microformats extensions, since you weren&#8217;t aware of Operator:</p>
<p><a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/firefox-extensions" rel="nofollow">http://microformats.org/wiki/firefox-extensions</a></p>
<p>And note that Firefox 3 will have a microformat API and associated features, heavily inspired by Operator:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_does_microformats_firefox3.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mozilla_does_microformats_firefox3.php</a></p>
<p>It seems to me that will give microformats a bigger boost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

