Comments on: A conversation with Fernanda Viégas and Martin Wattenberg about Many Eyes http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/ Strategies for Internet citizens Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:47:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Net-enhanced democracy: Amazing progress, solvable challenges « Jon Udell http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/#comment-124770 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:47:33 +0000 http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/#comment-124770 [...] On a related note, I enjoyed this snippet from a Wired interview with Martin Wattenberg, whom I also interviewed here. [...]

]]> By: Nodalities » Blog Archive » This Week’s Semantic Web http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/#comment-123136 Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:06:23 +0000 http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/#comment-123136 [...] Podcast: A conversation with Fernanda Viégas and Martin Wattenberg about Many Eyes [...]

]]> By: Bloggers talk to bloggers, scientists talk to scientists « Jon Udell http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/#comment-122263 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:40:08 +0000 http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/#comment-122263 [...] comment from Gordon Mohr on yesterday’s item about Many Eyes prompted a similar analysis. Gordon asks: …do the [...]

]]> By: Gordon Mohr http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/#comment-122258 Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:18:24 +0000 http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/21/a-conversation-with-fernanda-viegas-and-martin-wattenberg-about-many-eyes/#comment-122258 I haven’t listened to the podcast, but do the Many Eyes founders consider the statistical paradox that when testing large numbers of hypotheses, *most* recognized ‘statistically significant’ results may in fact be false?

A good discussion of the issue is here:

http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2005/09/why_most_publis.html

]]>