Comments on: Listas is (also) a web-based outliner

By: Turulcsirip - craigbalding

Turulcsirip - craigbalding — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:40:14 +0000

[...] The outlining tweet got me curious, went looking for how you do that (s/w). Found this: http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/29/listas-is-also-a-web-based-outliner/ Confused now « előző | következő » craigbalding — 2009. 01. 16. [...]

By: Idea processing => Lijstjes? => Outliners! - Frankwatching

Idea processing => Lijstjes? => Outliners! - Frankwatching — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:24:27 +0000

[...] Jon Udell schreef vorige maand: “As always when I try a new outliner, I find myself asking: Why don’t I make regular use of outlining? I believe that I should, and whenever I do feel virtuous, but it never becomes a habit. After all these years, and many different outliners, I don’t think that’s because the software lacks some magical feature that would convert me into a regular user. I suspect that outlining appeals to a cognitive style that’s more well-developed in some people than others, and I’m one of the others.” Bron: Jon Udell – Listas is (also) a web-based outliner [...]

By: Whatever-ishere

Whatever-ishere — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:36:51 +0000

thanks for the GREAT post! Very useful…

By: Rick Moynihan

Rick Moynihan — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:24:06 +0000

Ron, I entirely agree about your point about supporting soft-links between outlines and getting alternate views and ways of organising the information contained within them. Whilst I acknowledge it’s a long way from the mainstream, Emacs orgmode ( http://orgmode.org/ ) is an excellent package which I use to keep track of my agenda, lists, notes etc…

It provides tags, links etc and powerful commands to search and collapse outlines so you can view only the information you require. I find this flexibility helps stave off the ontology problem, although you always seem to reach a point where you need to refactor what you have into a more manageable structure.

I find it’s important to remember that both structured and unstructured information have costs and trade offs associated with them. Tools like orgmode are good in that they provide a mixture of light and (relatively) heavyweight tools to introduce more structure where it’s needed and gradually reposition yourself on this continuum.

I think we’ve started to see more mainstream tools try and adopt this approach e.g. tadalist, stikkit, tiddlywiki etc…

By: Ron Perrella

Ron Perrella — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:12:39 +0000

It could be that, like myself, you find yourself hampered by what I like to call the ontology problem. That is to say, just about every hierarchy can be reasonably represented by a completely different looking hierarchy. For example, you organize your hierarchy by functional areas while I organize it by problem domain. But since there is no perfect organization, you end up churning on whatever you are trying to organize.

I wish that outliners allowed me to use “soft links” (think Unix File System) between related topics, perhaps allowing me to use “tags” on a sub-tree or some other organizational technology at the same time as the outline.

By: Greg Wilson

Greg Wilson — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:34:25 +0000

I used to use an outliner when writing fiction, but eventually decided it was getting in the way of the story: I don’t think in plot points, but in dialog. Perhaps the natural human inclination toward narrative is the “problem”?