<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remixing the library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loose Cannon Librarian » Going local in the Library</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-123048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loose Cannon Librarian » Going local in the Library]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-123048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Is library way out on periphery? Is that bad? Long Tail says being outlier is okay. But some want to be the center of it all and can do it. John Udell&#8217;s remixing the library. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is library way out on periphery? Is that bad? Long Tail says being outlier is okay. But some want to be the center of it all and can do it. John Udell&#8217;s remixing the library. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Arbor&#8217;s public library is a beacon of progress &#171; Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-122806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann Arbor&#8217;s public library is a beacon of progress &#171; Jon Udell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-122806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the way for this kind of productive teamwork. It&#8217;s not a natural reflex, as Cassandra Targett points out:  It&#8217;s a shift from being passive recipients of the world&#8217;s knowledge to active [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the way for this kind of productive teamwork. It&#8217;s not a natural reflex, as Cassandra Targett points out:  It&#8217;s a shift from being passive recipients of the world&#8217;s knowledge to active [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Distant Librarian</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-70720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Distant Librarian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-70720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Jon Udell on remixing the library&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jon Udell on remixing the library</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-69110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[engtech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-69110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish more libraries would implement features found in http://libraryelf.com

I originally rolled my own library scraper to give me email updates, but now I&#039;ve been using library elf for two years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish more libraries would implement features found in <a href="http://libraryelf.com" rel="nofollow">http://libraryelf.com</a></p>
<p>I originally rolled my own library scraper to give me email updates, but now I&#8217;ve been using library elf for two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Library Pad</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-68575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Science Library Pad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-68575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;remix global research for a global civilisation: GRL 2020&lt;/strong&gt;

Stuart Weibel has a detailed writeup summarising Global Research Library 2020: GRL-2020: advocacy for a digital civilization of the future?The phrase I liked the most in these discussions is advocacy for the digital civilization of the future (Peter Yo...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>remix global research for a global civilisation: GRL 2020</strong></p>
<p>Stuart Weibel has a detailed writeup summarising Global Research Library 2020: GRL-2020: advocacy for a digital civilization of the future?The phrase I liked the most in these discussions is advocacy for the digital civilization of the future (Peter Yo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra Targett</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-68494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassandra Targett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/10/08/remixing-the-library/#comment-68494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jon,

Your paper helped crystallize an idea that&#039;s been slowly dawning on me recently:  One of the big challenges facing my fellow librarians is that the central tenet of our role is changing from being the caretakers of the information repository to being designers of the content going into that repository.  For the last couple hundred years librarians could follow prescribed rules to provide world-class access to the latest scientific and philosophic breakthroughs without actually being top scientists or philosophers. It&#039;s a shift from being passive recipients of the world&#039;s knowledge to active participants in its creation, a shift that in many ways goes against some of the deepest core principles of what has become library science.  

The traditional packages (book, journal) are only a few of the many ways knowledge is available now - some of the most compelling work in certain fields is comparatively unpackaged and uncontrolled. For a profession steeped in the idea that our role is to describe packaged knowledge and then help people find it (and play no role in how they use it once we point the way to it), the idea that we can not only modify some types of packages or even create substantially new ones is quite foreign still.  I don&#039;t think  we suddenly need to become biologists or criminologists to work with data specific to those fields, and especially not to design how it can be used, but there are some important conceptual hurdles to get over before we can really get going with it (i.e., we&#039;re still trying to figure out how to get all the online journals we subscribe to into that OPAC thing no one can actually use...).

- Cassandra]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>Your paper helped crystallize an idea that&#8217;s been slowly dawning on me recently:  One of the big challenges facing my fellow librarians is that the central tenet of our role is changing from being the caretakers of the information repository to being designers of the content going into that repository.  For the last couple hundred years librarians could follow prescribed rules to provide world-class access to the latest scientific and philosophic breakthroughs without actually being top scientists or philosophers. It&#8217;s a shift from being passive recipients of the world&#8217;s knowledge to active participants in its creation, a shift that in many ways goes against some of the deepest core principles of what has become library science.  </p>
<p>The traditional packages (book, journal) are only a few of the many ways knowledge is available now &#8211; some of the most compelling work in certain fields is comparatively unpackaged and uncontrolled. For a profession steeped in the idea that our role is to describe packaged knowledge and then help people find it (and play no role in how they use it once we point the way to it), the idea that we can not only modify some types of packages or even create substantially new ones is quite foreign still.  I don&#8217;t think  we suddenly need to become biologists or criminologists to work with data specific to those fields, and especially not to design how it can be used, but there are some important conceptual hurdles to get over before we can really get going with it (i.e., we&#8217;re still trying to figure out how to get all the online journals we subscribe to into that OPAC thing no one can actually use&#8230;).</p>
<p>- Cassandra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

