<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collaborative mapping and computational thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Domain Registration - 5 Reasons to Protect Yourself at This page describes the term domain name and lists</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/#comment-66504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Private Domain Registration - 5 Reasons to Protect Yourself at This page describes the term domain name and lists]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/#comment-66504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Collaborative mapping and computational thinkingWhen Eric MacKnight pointed me to Ewan McIntoshs reflections on Stuart Meldrums mapping project , he said: This struck me as an idea that would interest you. It does. These folks are reaching for ways to build maps collaboratively in. No Tags [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Collaborative mapping and computational thinkingWhen Eric MacKnight pointed me to Ewan McIntoshs reflections on Stuart Meldrums mapping project , he said: This struck me as an idea that would interest you. It does. These folks are reaching for ways to build maps collaboratively in. No Tags [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Oren</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/#comment-58517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Oren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/#comment-58517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As soon as you propose a communal information base you&#039;re into a largely non-technical design space.  The database is a commons, and its creation and sustenance invokes all the public goods and commons issues well known in economics and sociology.  Overcoming those problems requires all the social equity you can muster, and it would seem that organizing around that need - mirroring any extant social networks, for instance - is going to trump architectural purism, or at least should be taken as an overriding requirement on that architecture.

For my examples, I&#039;d suggest a look at the GPS games Waymarking [http://www.waymarking.com] and Geocaching [http://www.geocaching.com].  Both are based on community construction of a shared data space layered over real space, and differ in whether the &#039;mark&#039; is purely virtual or involves placing a physical object.  Other than being a similar design problem, it&#039;s also interesting to note that both have developed much the same layered delegation of authority and responsibilities to the user community that also appeared years ago in the form of mods/sysops in settings like BBS&#039;, Usenet, The Well and online services.  That&#039;s a form of layering that&#039;s probably as important as separation of technical concerns.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as you propose a communal information base you&#8217;re into a largely non-technical design space.  The database is a commons, and its creation and sustenance invokes all the public goods and commons issues well known in economics and sociology.  Overcoming those problems requires all the social equity you can muster, and it would seem that organizing around that need &#8211; mirroring any extant social networks, for instance &#8211; is going to trump architectural purism, or at least should be taken as an overriding requirement on that architecture.</p>
<p>For my examples, I&#8217;d suggest a look at the GPS games Waymarking [http://www.waymarking.com] and Geocaching [http://www.geocaching.com].  Both are based on community construction of a shared data space layered over real space, and differ in whether the &#8216;mark&#8217; is purely virtual or involves placing a physical object.  Other than being a similar design problem, it&#8217;s also interesting to note that both have developed much the same layered delegation of authority and responsibilities to the user community that also appeared years ago in the form of mods/sysops in settings like BBS&#8217;, Usenet, The Well and online services.  That&#8217;s a form of layering that&#8217;s probably as important as separation of technical concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Turner</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/#comment-57648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/#comment-57648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to suggest you check out Mapufacture [http://mapufacture.com] as well. You can bring in geo-feeds from any location and aggregate them together into a map. Like your example of &quot;School registry&quot; - any school or district could publish it&#039;s own feed of locations, and then states or governments could just aggregate these together. 

Or within a school or community, allow each group to maintain their own data source: soccer team game locations, community gardening centers, interest groups, clubs, etc. and then build a community map from these various data sources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to suggest you check out Mapufacture [http://mapufacture.com] as well. You can bring in geo-feeds from any location and aggregate them together into a map. Like your example of &#8220;School registry&#8221; &#8211; any school or district could publish it&#8217;s own feed of locations, and then states or governments could just aggregate these together. </p>
<p>Or within a school or community, allow each group to maintain their own data source: soccer team game locations, community gardening centers, interest groups, clubs, etc. and then build a community map from these various data sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikel Maron</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/#comment-57384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikel Maron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/08/29/collaborative-mapping-and-computational-thinking/#comment-57384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi John -- I greatly recommend you check out OpenStreetMap [http://openstreetmap.org. -- Mikel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John &#8212; I greatly recommend you check out OpenStreetMap [http://openstreetmap.org. &#8212; Mikel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

