<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind the scenes: The editing of a screencast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-45267</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Udell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-45267</guid>
		<description>&quot;What I want to know is how long it took you to edit out the twenty minutes — was it longer than twenty minutes?&quot;

Oh sure. Maybe an hour or so if I&#039;d only been editing, but since I was also logging the edits it was way longer than usual.

&quot;or did you just focus on listening and watching and interviewing&quot;

Yes.

&quot;You gave us the log of your edits, but did you do those as you went along - did the use of markers make it more efficient?&quot;

I think it&#039;s an excellent discipline to mark everything, and sometimes I do, but sometimes I am impatient and just plunge in and do things directly. This was one of the latter cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What I want to know is how long it took you to edit out the twenty minutes — was it longer than twenty minutes?&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh sure. Maybe an hour or so if I&#8217;d only been editing, but since I was also logging the edits it was way longer than usual.</p>
<p>&#8220;or did you just focus on listening and watching and interviewing&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
<p>&#8220;You gave us the log of your edits, but did you do those as you went along &#8211; did the use of markers make it more efficient?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s an excellent discipline to mark everything, and sometimes I do, but sometimes I am impatient and just plunge in and do things directly. This was one of the latter cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Kanter</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-45149</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Kanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-45149</guid>
		<description>and one other major reflection and ah for me.   Perhaps just the difference in the techniques.  I tend to edit at the storyboard and scripting level ... but with an interview, I guess you flip it - capture everything and go back an  edit.

So, here&#039;s the real thing I want to know:

-You must have had some bullet points jotted down someplace before you started to interview?
-As you were doing the interview, did you jot down any place in the audio that was like the &quot;keepers&quot; or did you just focus on listening and watching and interviewing - and then while listening to the whole tape started to mark it?
-You gave us the log of your edits, but did you do those as you went along - did the use of markers make it more efficient?

inquiring minds want to know ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and one other major reflection and ah for me.   Perhaps just the difference in the techniques.  I tend to edit at the storyboard and scripting level &#8230; but with an interview, I guess you flip it &#8211; capture everything and go back an  edit.</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s the real thing I want to know:</p>
<p>-You must have had some bullet points jotted down someplace before you started to interview?<br />
-As you were doing the interview, did you jot down any place in the audio that was like the &#8220;keepers&#8221; or did you just focus on listening and watching and interviewing &#8211; and then while listening to the whole tape started to mark it?<br />
-You gave us the log of your edits, but did you do those as you went along &#8211; did the use of markers make it more efficient?</p>
<p>inquiring minds want to know ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Kanter</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-45147</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Kanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-45147</guid>
		<description>What I want to know is how long it took you to edit out the twenty minutes -- was it longer than twenty minutes? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to know is how long it took you to edit out the twenty minutes &#8212; was it longer than twenty minutes? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Van Dijck&#8217;s Guide to Ease &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-43030</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Van Dijck&#8217;s Guide to Ease &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-43030</guid>
		<description>[...] great, tiny step by tiny step, example of editing a screencast (or any interview) by Mr. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] great, tiny step by tiny step, example of editing a screencast (or any interview) by Mr. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-42936</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Udell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-42936</guid>
		<description>&quot;Good intro into trimming the audio fat, but I think you could have been a little more ruthless — too many pauses, and 10 second diversions!&quot;

Hmm. OK, noted.

&quot;Also, as a note for future casts, you might want to ensure that both speakers are approximately the same volume — you are very quiet in comparison to Henrik.&quot;

Yeah, sorry about that. Normally I record to separate stereo tracks, and I thought Camtasia was configured that way, but it wasn&#039;t so there was no way to separately adjust the tracks as I usually do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Good intro into trimming the audio fat, but I think you could have been a little more ruthless — too many pauses, and 10 second diversions!&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmm. OK, noted.</p>
<p>&#8220;Also, as a note for future casts, you might want to ensure that both speakers are approximately the same volume — you are very quiet in comparison to Henrik.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, sorry about that. Normally I record to separate stereo tracks, and I thought Camtasia was configured that way, but it wasn&#8217;t so there was no way to separately adjust the tracks as I usually do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Hayden &#187; John Udell has a great post on hi process editing screencasts.</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-42918</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Hayden &#187; John Udell has a great post on hi process editing screencasts.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-42918</guid>
		<description>[...] John Udell has a great post on hi process editing screencasts.  &#160;#      if (ShowGoogleAd == 1) { document.write(&quot;&quot;); } [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Udell has a great post on hi process editing screencasts.  &nbsp;#      if (ShowGoogleAd == 1) { document.write(&#8220;&#8221;); } [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveG</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-42908</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/07/25/behind-the-scenes-the-editing-of-a-screencast/#comment-42908</guid>
		<description>Good intro into trimming the audio fat, but I think you could have been a little more ruthless -- too many pauses, and 10 second diversions! Also, as a note for future casts, you might want to ensure that both speakers are approximately the same volume -- you are very quite in comparison to Henrik.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good intro into trimming the audio fat, but I think you could have been a little more ruthless &#8212; too many pauses, and 10 second diversions! Also, as a note for future casts, you might want to ensure that both speakers are approximately the same volume &#8212; you are very quite in comparison to Henrik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
