<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WS-JustRight revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:06:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mikechampion's weblog : WS-Bandwagon or WS-JustRight?</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/#comment-25809</link>
		<dc:creator>mikechampion's weblog : WS-Bandwagon or WS-JustRight?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/#comment-25809</guid>
		<description>[...] possible management service invocations.&#160; In other words, it exemplifies what Jon Udell calls WS-JustRight&#160;for its intended domain: &quot;I stand by what I’ve been saying all along, in a variety of places [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] possible management service invocations.&nbsp; In other words, it exemplifies what Jon Udell calls WS-JustRight&nbsp;for its intended domain: &#8220;I stand by what I’ve been saying all along, in a variety of places [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuzhai</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/#comment-25250</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuzhai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 21:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/#comment-25250</guid>
		<description>I found the point about the difference between , and ; in URI&#039;s interesting. It seems to me that there&#039;s a striking similarity to a Python best practice, which says that tuples should be used to build data structures of sorts by combining (possibly differently typed) objects, while lists are generally variable sized containers which hold objects which are all of the same type. E.g., in Python, I would represent longitude, latitude as a tuple (longitude, latitude), while I would have the color components of a certain paint mix in a list [&#039;red&#039;, &#039;blue&#039;, &#039;green&#039;] (or even [(255, 0, 0), (0, 255, 0), (0, 0, 255)], to combine both forms).

Just thought this was an interesting parallel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the point about the difference between , and ; in URI&#8217;s interesting. It seems to me that there&#8217;s a striking similarity to a Python best practice, which says that tuples should be used to build data structures of sorts by combining (possibly differently typed) objects, while lists are generally variable sized containers which hold objects which are all of the same type. E.g., in Python, I would represent longitude, latitude as a tuple (longitude, latitude), while I would have the color components of a certain paint mix in a list ['red', 'blue', 'green'] (or even [(255, 0, 0), (0, 255, 0), (0, 0, 255)], to combine both forms).</p>
<p>Just thought this was an interesting parallel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/#comment-25229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Udell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/#comment-25229</guid>
		<description>Thanks David. Nope, the duplication was a cut/paste glitch :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David. Nope, the duplication was a cut/paste glitch :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ing</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/#comment-25108</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/06/05/ws-justright-revisited/#comment-25108</guid>
		<description>Jon - worth checking that quote from Mike Champions; it&#039;s either a typo or shades of &#039;New York New York&#039;. Unless, of course, he just *really* meant it, perhaps as an affirmation-style mantra...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon &#8211; worth checking that quote from Mike Champions; it&#8217;s either a typo or shades of &#8216;New York New York&#8217;. Unless, of course, he just *really* meant it, perhaps as an affirmation-style mantra&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
