<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A conversation with John Lam about the dynamic language runtime, Silverlight, and Ruby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silverlight at the end of the tunnel &#124; Richard Hartley</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-185570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silverlight at the end of the tunnel &#124; Richard Hartley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-185570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to build it from scratch. A brilliant move by Microsoft.There&#039;s also an interesting podcast where Jon Udell talks to John Lam (creator of Ruby CLR) about the DLR. On Channel 9, Tim Heuer did a video interview: MIX07: John Lam [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to build it from scratch. A brilliant move by Microsoft.There&#039;s also an interesting podcast where Jon Udell talks to John Lam (creator of Ruby CLR) about the DLR. On Channel 9, Tim Heuer did a video interview: MIX07: John Lam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silverlight at the end of the tunnel</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-153866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silverlight at the end of the tunnel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-153866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] also an interesting podcast where Jon Udell talks to John Lam (creator of Ruby CLR) about the DLR. On Channel 9, Tim Heuer did a video interview: MIX07: John Lam [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also an interesting podcast where Jon Udell talks to John Lam (creator of Ruby CLR) about the DLR. On Channel 9, Tim Heuer did a video interview: MIX07: John Lam [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silverlight (and Ruby on the .NET CLR) &#124; eXpand yOur cReativity</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-123331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silverlight (and Ruby on the .NET CLR) &#124; eXpand yOur cReativity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-123331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] What all of this means is that there&#8217;s baked-in support for Ruby in what could be one of the biggest runtime environments on the Web in the next few years, and this can only be a good thing for Ruby. Jon Udell sat down with John Lam (the creator of RubyCLR) and talked about the DLR, Ruby, and how the whole caboodle works / will work. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What all of this means is that there&#8217;s baked-in support for Ruby in what could be one of the biggest runtime environments on the Web in the next few years, and this can only be a good thing for Ruby. Jon Udell sat down with John Lam (the creator of RubyCLR) and talked about the DLR, Ruby, and how the whole caboodle works / will work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eXpand yOur cReativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Silverlight (and Ruby on the .NET CLR)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-122976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eXpand yOur cReativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Silverlight (and Ruby on the .NET CLR)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-122976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] What all of this means is that there&#8217;s baked-in support for Ruby in what could be one of the biggest runtime environments on the Web in the next few years, and this can only be a good thing for Ruby. Jon Udell sat down with John Lam (the creator of RubyCLR) and talked about the DLR, Ruby, and how the whole caboodle works / will work. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What all of this means is that there&#8217;s baked-in support for Ruby in what could be one of the biggest runtime environments on the Web in the next few years, and this can only be a good thing for Ruby. Jon Udell sat down with John Lam (the creator of RubyCLR) and talked about the DLR, Ruby, and how the whole caboodle works / will work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphaël Valyi</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-122244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raphaël Valyi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-122244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;JavaScript arguably isn’t well suited to programming in the medium-to-large&quot;
Oh yes? And guess why? M$ is arguably half responsible of this because of their arguably not very suited web browsers...
As for the other half, I should recognize that it&#039;s simply inherent to the language been poor indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;JavaScript arguably isn’t well suited to programming in the medium-to-large&#8221;<br />
Oh yes? And guess why? M$ is arguably half responsible of this because of their arguably not very suited web browsers&#8230;<br />
As for the other half, I should recognize that it&#8217;s simply inherent to the language been poor indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: art&#8217;s abode &#187; Ruby and Silverlight</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-84664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[art&#8217;s abode &#187; Ruby and Silverlight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-84664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] John Lam (the RubyCLR developer) discusses DLR, ruby and Silverlight. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Lam (the RubyCLR developer) discusses DLR, ruby and Silverlight. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; My lunch with Ray Ozzie and Scott Guthrie &#124; The Universal Desktop &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-19523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; My lunch with Ray Ozzie and Scott Guthrie &#124; The Universal Desktop &#124; ZDNet.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-19523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] asked about the inclusion of the Dynamic Language Runtime, something Scott announced during his part of the keynote and something that garnered a bit of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] asked about the inclusion of the Dynamic Language Runtime, something Scott announced during his part of the keynote and something that garnered a bit of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Mueller</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-14257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Mueller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-14257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just provided a bit of a rebuttal / posed some questions based on a sound bite from the podcast: http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/pmuellr?entry=structured_javascript 
.

This is all great stuff; can&#039;t wait to see and hear more about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just provided a bit of a rebuttal / posed some questions based on a sound bite from the podcast: <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/pmuellr?entry=structured_javascript" rel="nofollow">http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/pmuellr?entry=structured_javascript</a><br />
.</p>
<p>This is all great stuff; can&#8217;t wait to see and hear more about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeFlow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Silverlight</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CodeFlow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Silverlight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 06:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of Silverlight, Microsoft is doing some open source scripting languages that run inside it (the Dynamic Language Runtime). They&#8217;ve already released some demos where they are running IronPython (Python) and Managed [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Silverlight, Microsoft is doing some open source scripting languages that run inside it (the Dynamic Language Runtime). They&#8217;ve already released some demos where they are running IronPython (Python) and Managed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Kraus</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Kraus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 12:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Parenthesis</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open Parenthesis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Achieving Vendor Lock-In Through Open Source&lt;/strong&gt;

There seems to be a renewed interest from proprietary software vendors in the use open source to create vendor lock in. 
This week, add Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight 1.1 and Dynamic Languages Runtime to the mix alongside Adobe&#8217;s Flex SDK. 
Jeff G...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Achieving Vendor Lock-In Through Open Source</strong></p>
<p>There seems to be a renewed interest from proprietary software vendors in the use open source to create vendor lock in.<br />
This week, add Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight 1.1 and Dynamic Languages Runtime to the mix alongside Adobe&#8217;s Flex SDK.<br />
Jeff G&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silverlight (and Ruby on the .NET CLR)</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silverlight (and Ruby on the .NET CLR)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 05:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] What all of this means is that there&#039;s baked-in support for Ruby in what could be one of the biggest runtime environments on the Web in the next few years, and this can only be a good thing for Ruby. Jon Udell sat down with John Lam (the creator of RubyCLR) and talked about the DLR, Ruby, and how the whole caboodle works / will work. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What all of this means is that there&#8217;s baked-in support for Ruby in what could be one of the biggest runtime environments on the Web in the next few years, and this can only be a good thing for Ruby. Jon Udell sat down with John Lam (the creator of RubyCLR) and talked about the DLR, Ruby, and how the whole caboodle works / will work. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Welch</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John C. Welch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 15:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silverlight has an amazing potential, but honestly, I wish it was another company that owned it. Microsoft simply has too much baggage in the cross-platform area, things like Rotor, the PRFest that is Port 25, or going back a bit, Active X on !Microsoft.

They have regularly trotted out their &quot;new attitude&quot; towards interop, and it&#039;s lasted a version, if that long, then all of a sudden, it&#039;s a Windows - Only technology. Usually, after they&#039;ve seen enough sales in the dev tools to know that changing to a competing tech would be more than a little painful. The problem today is, that the people who made these earlier decisions are still, for the most part, running MSFT. So while the tech is cool, I can&#039;t really take it seriously as a &quot;universal&quot; RIA until I see regular updates for *all* supported platforms, and a few years of it being fully supported. 

Given MSFT&#039;s past and outside of one rather small business unit, its management&#039;s continual hatred of !Microsoft, trusting Microsoft MS to not act according to type is, IMO,  irresponsible at worst, unrealistic at best, especially considering that the current management team is the one that made the earlier decisions.

(And no, I don&#039;t particularly think of Ray Ozzie as the guy that will drag Microsoft into a brave new world of interop. I think of him as the guy who foisted Notes on the world, and as someone who has tried to both use and support Notes, I&#039;m not terribly impressed with the guy who created groupware best defined as something you do *to* people, not *for* people.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silverlight has an amazing potential, but honestly, I wish it was another company that owned it. Microsoft simply has too much baggage in the cross-platform area, things like Rotor, the PRFest that is Port 25, or going back a bit, Active X on !Microsoft.</p>
<p>They have regularly trotted out their &#8220;new attitude&#8221; towards interop, and it&#8217;s lasted a version, if that long, then all of a sudden, it&#8217;s a Windows &#8211; Only technology. Usually, after they&#8217;ve seen enough sales in the dev tools to know that changing to a competing tech would be more than a little painful. The problem today is, that the people who made these earlier decisions are still, for the most part, running MSFT. So while the tech is cool, I can&#8217;t really take it seriously as a &#8220;universal&#8221; RIA until I see regular updates for *all* supported platforms, and a few years of it being fully supported. </p>
<p>Given MSFT&#8217;s past and outside of one rather small business unit, its management&#8217;s continual hatred of !Microsoft, trusting Microsoft MS to not act according to type is, IMO,  irresponsible at worst, unrealistic at best, especially considering that the current management team is the one that made the earlier decisions.</p>
<p>(And no, I don&#8217;t particularly think of Ray Ozzie as the guy that will drag Microsoft into a brave new world of interop. I think of him as the guy who foisted Notes on the world, and as someone who has tried to both use and support Notes, I&#8217;m not terribly impressed with the guy who created groupware best defined as something you do *to* people, not *for* people.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rowett&#8217;s Workblog &#187; Links for Wed May 02 2007</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Rowett&#8217;s Workblog &#187; Links for Wed May 02 2007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 10:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A conversation with John Lam about the dynamic language runtime, Silverlight, and RubyJohn Lam is the creator of RubyCLR (a bridge between Ruby and the .NET framework) who disappeared into the bowels of Microsoft a few months back. I&#8217;ll give this a listen when I get back from my holiday&#8230;[Tags: workblog&#160;podcast&#160;dynamiclanguages&#160;ruby] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A conversation with John Lam about the dynamic language runtime, Silverlight, and RubyJohn Lam is the creator of RubyCLR (a bridge between Ruby and the .NET framework) who disappeared into the bowels of Microsoft a few months back. I&#8217;ll give this a listen when I get back from my holiday&#8230;[Tags: workblog&nbsp;podcast&nbsp;dynamiclanguages&nbsp;ruby] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-05-02</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[People Over Process &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-05-02]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 07:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/04/30/a-conversation-with-john-lam-about-the-dynamic-language-runtime-silverlight-and-ruby/#comment-13189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A conversation with John Lam about the dynamic language runtime, Silverlight, and Ruby « Jon Udell On the CLR/DLR thingy in browsers. (tags: via:JamesGovernor dlr clr silverlight wpf/e browsers ria dynamiclanguages) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A conversation with John Lam about the dynamic language runtime, Silverlight, and Ruby « Jon Udell On the CLR/DLR thingy in browsers. (tags: via:JamesGovernor dlr clr silverlight wpf/e browsers ria dynamiclanguages) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

