<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rich application engines and user innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/</link>
	<description>Strategies for Internet citizens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:06:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: learningAPI.com: Media and Learning Technology - Larry Bouthillier</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/#comment-5236</link>
		<dc:creator>learningAPI.com: Media and Learning Technology - Larry Bouthillier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/#comment-5236</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Online Video and Web 2.0 - What&#039;s missing?&lt;/strong&gt;

Dan Rayburn points out in his Business of Online Video blog that streaming video isn&#039;t a Web 2.0 technology. &#160;But while Dan&#039;s point is that streaming video has&#160;been around way too long to be considered part of the Web 2.0...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online Video and Web 2.0 &#8211; What&#8217;s missing?</strong></p>
<p>Dan Rayburn points out in his Business of Online Video blog that streaming video isn&#8217;t a Web 2.0 technology. &nbsp;But while Dan&#8217;s point is that streaming video has&nbsp;been around way too long to be considered part of the Web 2.0&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Parenthesis</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Parenthesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Creating Rich Internet Applications on Open Source&lt;/strong&gt;

Should you build your RIA application in Flash or Ajax? On an open source technology or with a proprietary vendor?
At AjaxWorld this week, I was amazed at the number of solutions for creating Rich Internet Applications. On the Open Source front, the us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Creating Rich Internet Applications on Open Source</strong></p>
<p>Should you build your RIA application in Flash or Ajax? On an open source technology or with a proprietary vendor?<br />
At AjaxWorld this week, I was amazed at the number of solutions for creating Rich Internet Applications. On the Open Source front, the us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; links for 2007-03-20</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>James Governor&#8217;s Monkchips &#187; links for 2007-03-20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>[...] Rich application engines and user innovation « Jon Udell Anything I can&#8217;t link to sucks. if its not chunkable and available its lame. But yes we do need new kinds of crawlers and indexing technology. (tags: hyperlinks web2.0 text) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rich application engines and user innovation « Jon Udell Anything I can&#8217;t link to sucks. if its not chunkable and available its lame. But yes we do need new kinds of crawlers and indexing technology. (tags: hyperlinks web2.0 text) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All in a days work&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>All in a days work&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jonudell.net/2007/03/19/rich-application-engines-and-user-innovation/#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>[...] Rich application engines and user innovation &#8220;I assert that there is something wrong with web-like “rich” formats that aren’t hyperlink-able or indexable by SEs.&#8221; Linking and indexing are key enablers of user innovation. To the extent that Flash or WPF/E can be web-like, we surely want them to (tags: RIA Innovation Flash WPF/E) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rich application engines and user innovation &#8220;I assert that there is something wrong with web-like “rich” formats that aren’t hyperlink-able or indexable by SEs.&#8221; Linking and indexing are key enablers of user innovation. To the extent that Flash or WPF/E can be web-like, we surely want them to (tags: RIA Innovation Flash WPF/E) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
